Previous page | New search |
The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here
Periodical article | Leiden University catalogue | WorldCat |
Title: | Towards a Culture of Good Governance: The Presidential Review Commission and Public Service Reforms in South Africa |
Author: | Bardill, John E. |
Year: | 2000 |
Periodical: | Public Administration and Development |
Volume: | 20 |
Issue: | 2 |
Period: | May |
Pages: | 103-118 |
Language: | English |
Geographic term: | South Africa |
Subjects: | civil service reform Politics and Government Development and Technology Economics and Trade |
External link: | https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-162X(200005)20:2<103::AID-PAD116>3.0.CO;2-4 |
Abstract: | The leaders of the new South Africa were quick to appreciate that their commitment to democratization, nationbuilding and reconstruction and development could not be realized without a fundamental restructuring of the postapartheid bureaucracy from an instrument of discrimination and domination to an agency which serves and empowers in an accountable and transparent way. The framework for this policy was set out in a White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service (WPTPS), published in November 1995. A Presidential Review Commission (PRC) was established in March 1996 to examine the operation, transformation and development of the public service and to make recommendations for improving the reform processes in line with the WPTPS. This article reviews the findings and recommendations of the PRC report (March 1998) with regard to the transformation of the structures and functions of government, including human resources development, budgeting and financial management, and information management, and assesses the prospects for their successful implementation. The institutional reform package proposed by the PRC should be attended by a reorientation of values, attitudes and power relations. Tensions and contradictions inherent in the dual transition to political and economic liberalization must be resolved. The PRC's findings are based on the belief that the weaknesses of public sector transformation are caused by problems of implementation rather than formulation. This belief overlooks that political and administrative policy processes are intertwined. Bibliogr., notes, sum. |