Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:NGOs and the Constitutional Debate in Zimbabwe: From Inclusion to Exclusion
Author:Dorman, Sara RichISNI
Year:2003
Periodical:Journal of Southern African Studies
Volume:29
Issue:4
Period:December
Pages:845-863
Language:English
Geographic term:Zimbabwe
Subjects:NGO
political change
constitutional reform
Politics and Government
Law, Human Rights and Violence
External link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305707032000135851
Abstract:Two competing processes of constitutional reform occurred in Zimbabwe between 1997 and 2000. In 1997, the National Constitutional Assembly (NCA), led by churches, NGOs and unions, was formed and initiated a constitutional debate. In 1999, the ZANU(PF) government of Robert Mugabe attempted to reclaim the debate by launching a Constitutional Commission (CC) with a mandate to consult Zimbabweans and draft a new constitution, to be voted on in a plebiscite in February 2000. The governmental process was unprecedented in its participatory and inclusive nature. Opposition politicians, NGO activists and church people were included alongside ZANU(PF) stalwarts. At the same time, the rhetoric used against those in the NCA who rejected the invitation to participate grew increasingly exclusionary and intolerant. The ruling party was, in this period, beset by revelations of scandals, financial crises and declining social services. The constitutional debate was, at least in part, an attempt to regain control of political discourse, even as the State's ability to provide services was weakened. Instead, the public consultations provided a platform for the articulation of devastating critiques of the regime's policies in public meetings that were covered extensively in the media. The government's defeat in the referendum, in which voters rejected the draft constitution, legitimated the existence of organizations and ideas outside the hegemony of the ruling party/State. The voting public affirmed the claims made by the NCA to speak and act outside the remit of the State. This rejection of the way in which politics had been done since independence set the stage for the violent and coercive politics of 2000 and beyond. Notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views
Cover