AfricaBib 
bibliographic database
| Previous page | New search |
The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here
 Periodical article |
 Leiden University catalogue |
 WorldCat |
| Title: | Africa's 'charismatic megafauna' and Berlin's 'two concepts of liberty': postcolony routes to utopia? |
| Author: | Cloete, Elsie |
| Year: | 2008 |
| Periodical: | Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies |
| Volume: | 35 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| Pages: | 257-276 |
| Language: | English |
| Geographic term: | Southern Africa |
| Subjects: | national parks and reserves elephants wildlife protection ethics community participation |
| External link: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02589340903017908 |
| Abstract: | Charismatic megafauna are those animals, in particular elephants, which have achieved international star status and have been accorded moral significance. In southern Africa, where elephants are relatively plentiful, environmental havoc is being wreaked because so many of them are confined within fortress-like islands of conservation. International and local pressure on nations in Africa to not only preserve biodiversity and conserve and increase its animal species holdings without killing off 'surplus' elephants, has led to the creation of transfrontier conservation areas. While few people would contest the idea that this is morally good and environmentally sound practice, the new ethics in extending conservation areas to surround human settlements raises questions about freedom and hospitality between humans and non-human animals in southern Africa's postcolonies. In this article it is argued that Isaiah Berlin's notion of negative liberty is being, albeit unconsciously, expanded to include elephants, while humans living in and alongside these enlarged conservation areas are being coerced or persuaded to co-operate by not interfering with these elephants. The Kavango-Zambezi transfrontier mega-conservation area, or KAZA, located in Botswana, Namibia, Angola, Zambia and Zimbabwe, illustrates the argument. Bibliogr., notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract] |
