Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:Substantive equality for disabled learners in State provision of basic education: a commentary on 'Western Cape Forum for intellectual disability v Government of the Republic of South Africa'
Authors:Ngwena, CharlesISNI
Pretorius, LootISNI
Year:2012
Periodical:South African Journal on Human Rights (ISSN 0258-7203)
Volume:28
Issue:1
Pages:81-115
Language:English
Geographic term:South Africa
Subjects:people with disabilities
access to education
equal opportunity
discrimination
jurisprudence
social and economic rights
External link:https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2012.11865037
Abstract:Disabled learners are a protected group with rights to equality and basic education under the Constitution of South Africa. Taking substantive equality and the right to basic education seriously requires the State, especially, to commit significant resources and take positive measures to ensure that the education system adequately accommodates the needs of disabled learners. However, the historical exclusion and marginalization of disabled people from the education system, the finite nature of economic resources and the fact that socio-economic rights are generally realizable incrementally, can easily provide the State with excuses rather than valid justifications for not meeting the learning needs of disabled learners. The aim of this article is two-fold. Firstly, it uses the decision of the Western Cape High Court in Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of the Republic of South Africa (2010) as an opportunity for interrogating the relationship between substantive equality and socio-economic rights as well as the relationship between the State and its obligations towards private 'partners' in the discharge of its socio-economic obligations through the use of so-called State 'subsidies'. Secondly, the article uses the education policy that was challenged in Western Cape Forum to highlight that disability is a severe site of discrimination. Even in post-apartheid South Africa, where the Constitution protects the equality rights of disabled people, it is easy for State policy that claims to be advancing a transformative agenda to paradoxically become an instrument for giving legitimacy to a disabling discourse. Ultimately, it is argued that when dealing with disability, equality jurisprudence needs a transformative theory of difference in order to guarantee inclusive citizenship. Notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views

Cover